Fb has introduced new security measures for Instagram in response to the storm of criticism it has acquired in gentle of paperwork and testimony from whistleblower Frances Haugen.

In an interview with CNN’s State of the Union, Nick Clegg, the corporate’s vp of worldwide affairs, on Sunday acknowledged that Fb could be rolling out three new measures to assist enhance the expertise susceptible teenagers have on Instagram. The corporate will permit adults to oversee what their teenagers are doing on-line in the event that they select to take action, “nudge” customers who’re taking a look at a variety of dangerous content material over to completely different content material, and immediate teenagers to “take a break” from Instagram.

The measures had been floated as doable concepts and options by Instagram head Adam Mosseri in late September when he introduced the corporate was pausing work on a model of the app for teenagers underneath 13. Clegg’s announcement on Sunday confirmed the measures have been now a part of Fb’s plan going ahead.

“We are able to’t change human nature,” Clegg stated. “You at all times examine your self to others, significantly those that are extra lucky to your self, however we will do is change our product, which is strictly what we’re doing.”

Within the interview, Clegg additionally tried to border Fb’s drawback as a problem society should face collectively and reiterated the corporate’s declare that Instagram is a optimistic expertise for the “overwhelming majority” of youngsters who use it and endure from sleeplessness, nervousness, and melancholy.

Nonetheless, Clegg’s feedback stand in stark distinction to a damning report revealed by the Wall Road Journal, which based mostly its story on inner paperwork supplied to it by Haugen. Within the paperwork, Fb’s inner researchers stated the corporate made physique picture points worse for 1 in 3 teen women who expertise them.

“Teenagers blame Instagram for will increase within the fee of hysteria and melancholy,” researchers stated in an inner presentation. “This response was unprompted and constant throughout all teams.”

One other presentation discovered that 13% of British customers and 6% of American customers who skilled suicidal ideas traced their want to kill themselves to Instagram, the Journal reported. Fb has disputed the outlet’s characterization of its analysis.

In response to Haugen’s declare that Fb positioned income over the psychological wellbeing of teenagers on its platform, Clegg highlighted the $13 billion funding the corporate has made in safety, which is “greater than the overall income of Twitter during the last 4 years.” He additionally identified that the corporate has 40,000 individuals, or greater than twice the variety of staffers on Capitol Hill, that work on these points.

“As I say, we can not with the wave of a wand make everybody’s life excellent. What we will do is enhance our merchandise in order that our merchandise are as secure and as pleasurable to make use of,” Clegg stated.

Whereas all that sounds nice, when you think about that Instagram is a poisonous museum of falsity regardless of all of that Fb cash and all these individuals working to make it “secure,” the one cheap response left is disbelief. Disbelief that even with all of these assets, Fb continues to be viciously succeeding at making our youngest and most susceptible really feel worse about themselves.