Amazon says over half a dozen {hardware} distributors have indicated that they can not enter right into a TV manufacturing relationship with the e-commerce group over concern of retaliation from Google, escalating pressure with the search large with whom it competes on a number of companies.

The revelation, formally shared by Amazon for the primary time, was made by the corporate’s unit in India to the Competitors Fee of India as half the antitrust watchdog’s years-long investigation into Google over claims that it abuses the dominant place in Android. Google does abuse its dominant place in Android, the regulator stated Thursday in an announcement, slapping a $162 million superb on Thursday.

As a part of the investigation, the Competitors Fee of India interviewed a number of business gamers together with Samsung, Microsoft and Mozilla. However no person spoke fairly so freely as Amazon, a fast evaluation of the 293-page order revealed on Friday confirmed.

Right here’s what Amazon instructed the CCI:

Amazon has explored working with cell OEMs/ODMs/CMs who additionally manufacture non-mobile sensible media units, resembling sensible TVs, to allow these producers to distribute non-mobile sensible media units (together with sensible TVs) operating the Fireplace OS (e.g., Fireplace TV Version (FTVE) for sensible TVs). In these discussions with OEMs, a minimum of seven OEMs have indicated that their capability to enter into a producing relationship of this sort with Amazon is both blocked fully or considerably restricted (e.g., by way of geographic scope) by their contractual commitments to Google and the priority that Google would retaliate towards one other of the OEM’s companies that produce Android units.

Amazon alleged that in “a number of circumstances” the gadget producer has indicated that it can not work with Amazon “regardless of a professed want to take action in reference to sensible TVs.” Even when the producers agreed to not work on Android-powered sensible TVs, they nonetheless had issues that by working with Amazon on Fireplace OS-powered TVs they may nonetheless be risking their GMS license from Google for different companies, Amazon stated.

Moreover, corporations together with Foxconn and Panasonic tried and didn’t get hold of permission from Google to work with Amazon, the e-commerce large stated.

In others, the OEM has tried and didn’t get hold of “permission” from Google. For instance, such discussions occurred with Skyworth, TPV (with respect to the Philips model), UMC (with respect to the Sharp model), Foxconn (with respect to the Sharp model), and Panasonic. Panasonic additionally shared issues about doable retaliation by Google towards its automotive and aviation companies if it proceeded with FTVE set up on sensible TVs.

In a collection of different accusations, Amazon additionally stated that smartphone distributors instructed the agency that their phrases with Google required them to have Google Chrome pre-installed on their handsets and a shortcut of the cell browser to be displayed on the house display screen of the gadget in a transfer that was detriment to the expansion of Amazon’s browser, Silk.

This impacted Amazon Silk adoption as a result of Amazon’s analysis on the time confirmed that the default browser was utilized by 58% of customers, leaving Amazon Silk to compete with different internet browsers resembling Opera, Firefox, and UC for the minority of customers not utilizing the default browser.

One other doable barrier to distribution was the request from OEMs that Amazon pay important quantities as a way to be pre-installed onto the gadget, however even with fee, OEMs would make no ensures as to app placement or willingness to forego the Chrome browser because the default browser (which might require them to take away the Google Play Retailer and different Google apps).

(On a facet be aware, Amazon stated it explored distribution offers with Reliance Jio, Micromax and Intel, one thing not beforehand recognized publicly, however the discussions didn’t materialize in significant success for Silk.)

Amazon, which operates Android-powered Fireplace OS that ships stripped of any in style Google cell service, evaluated internally whether or not to license Android OS and GMS “due to the boundaries created by the absence of GMS,” however determined towards it “as a result of it might be a ‘one-way door’ and end in ceding an excessive amount of management to Google over Amazon’s present and future units,” the corporate instructed the regulator.

The retailer cited the shortage of entry to Google Play and its related apps as key causes for the failure of Fireplace Telephone, the corporate’s smartphone.