YoungBoy By no means Broke Once more has scored a partial victory in his federal firearms case in his house state of Louisiana.

In accordance with court docket paperwork filed on Feb. 24, obtained by XXL at the moment (March 2), Choose Shelly D. Dick of the USA District Courtroom Center District of Louisiana has granted one of many motions the rapper’s authorized staff offered, which might suppress—or exclude—proof through an SD Media card that contained each video and pictures that seem to point out YoungBoy, born Kentrell Gauden, possessing firearms. The movement to suppress the firearm proof that was obtained on the time of YB’s arrest in Baton Rouge, La. in September of 2020, nevertheless, was denied.

On the time of the arrest two years in the past, YoungBoy was additionally hit with drug expenses.

The arrest came about at YoungBoy By no means Broke Once more’s video shoot, the place himself and 15 others have been taken into custody by the Baton Rouge Police Division. A name had been made to police that “a gaggle of individuals have been on Chippewa Road carrying firearms and filming a rap music video” and weapons have been brandished on the set of the video. Quite a few people fled the scene when police arrived, together with a person named Marvin Ramsey, YB’s cameraman in line with The Advocate, who was caught and in possession of a firearm and a black Sony 7R digital camera on a rotating mount, which contained an SD card.

The court docket submitting states that NBA YoungBoy was charged with possessing the firearm that Ramsey was carrying and was looking for to have that proof struck from the case.

Warrants have been issued for seven automobiles on the scene of the arrest, however solely two—a Cadillac SUV and an Acura SUV—are related to the case as a second firearm was discovered within the Acura and the SD playing cards, which have been in a digital camera bag that additionally contained firearm magazines for Ramsey’s weapon and a letter addressed to Ramsey, have been discovered within the Cadillac.

Within the authorized doc, YoungBoy argues that “the firearms and SD card media are fruits of the unlawful detentions of ‘Gaulden, Ramsey, and [the other people arrested] on September 28, 2020.’ He seeks suppression beneath the fruit of the toxic tree doctrine.” The fruit of the toxic tree doctrine extends the rule to excuse proof admissible in court docket if it was illegally obtained, which YB is claiming to be true.

YoungBoy argues that Corporal Barnett (“Cpl. Barnett”) of the BRPD Road Crimes Unit, who utilized for the search warrants, used “falsehoods” and omitted data when requesting permission to go looking the automobiles, which invalidates the warrants.

The submitting states, “Gaulden challenges the warrants for the Cadillac and Acura. He argues that the warrants have been unconstitutional beneath the Fourth Modification as a result of they lack particularity. Furthermore, he argues that the possible trigger affidavits used to acquire the warrants, all authored by Cpl. Barnett, contained quite a few falsehoods and materials omissions, so the warrants are invalid beneath the Supreme Courtroom’s choice in Franks v. Delaware. On that foundation, he seeks to suppress the firearm discovered within the Acura because the fruit of an unconstitutional warrant. He additionally seeks to suppress the SD Card Media because the fruit of the unconstitutional warrant to go looking the Cadillac.”

Franks v. Delaware is a U.S. Supreme Courtroom case that’s centered round a defendant’s proper to problem proof that was obtained utilizing a warrant based mostly on false data.

Choose Dick offered this query earlier than the court docket: “When a digital camera is discovered on the scene of a suspected possession crime, however it’s unknown which of a number of suspects possessed the contraband, is there possible trigger to go looking the digital camera for photographic proof of who possessed the contraband? On this case, the query is narrowed as a result of the post-excision affidavit comprises nothing to point that the digital camera contained proof of crimes.”

Thus, there was no possible trigger to grab the media card or assume that content material on the cardboard can be related to the crime simply because it was on the scene.

Dick additionally included:

“The primary mistake, failing to particularize the gadgets to be seized, is akin to the error in Allen. The affidavit included the request to “look by the Sony 7R digital camera, SD playing cards, and MacBook professional to assist decide who had possession of which firearm.” Thus, as in Allen, it may be gleaned that the issuing decide understood what Cpl. Barnett supposed to seek for. The failure to particularize, subsequently, doesn’t rise to the extent of police misconduct that evokes the exclusionary rule.

The second mistake rests with the officer that executed the warrant. As defined above, the warrant doesn’t authorize the search of the digital camera, SD playing cards, and laptop. This failure is obvious on the face of the warrant, which is barely over a web page lengthy. The executing officer ought to have recognized that he lacked authorized authority to go looking the gadgets listed on the warrant.

The Courtroom finds that the executing officer’s mistake of failing to learn and perceive the scope of authority that the warrant conveyed rises to the extent of gross negligence that the exclusionary rule is designed to discourage. To carry in any other case would encourage executing officers to imagine—relatively than learn—the contents of a warrant and construction their searches based mostly on what the affiant requested, relatively than what the issuing decide really granted. The Courtroom can’t discover that the executing officer acted in objectively affordable good religion when merely studying the warrant would have uncovered its deadly flaw. Subsequently, the Leon good religion exception to the exclusionary rule doesn’t apply.”

Allen refers back to the case of Leon in United States v. Allen. The federal government conceded that the challenged warrant was not sufficiently particularized and that, whereas there was an attachment that listed the gadgets to be seized, it was not integrated within the warrant.

YoungBoy By no means Broke Once more can also be going through federal firearms expenses in Los Angeles following a quick pursuit with the Los Angeles Police Division earlier than being extradited again to Louisiana, which is the place the preliminary warrant for his arrest was issued.

XXL has reached out to NBA YoungBoy’s legal professional and a rep for the rapper for remark.