She didn’t merely give her opinion and depart it at that. There’s a distinction between having a controversial opinion and actively saying issues that undermine the wellbeing of marginalized individuals. There are gamers within the NBA who took a stance in opposition to being vaccinated and sat out in a decent manner, for instance, after which there’s Aaron Rodgers within the NFL who misled individuals about his vaccination standing, didn’t observe protocols, after which acted like he was a sufferer.

Right here’s one:

On June 6, 2020, Rowling retweeted an op-ed piece that mentioned “individuals who menstruate,” apparently taking problem with the truth that the story didn’t use the phrase girls. “‘Individuals who menstruate.’ I’m certain there was a phrase for these individuals. Somebody assist me out. Wumben? Wimpund? Woomud?” she wrote

She actively has a problem with others who assist trans individuals. She even deleted a tweet praising Stephen King for saying Trans girls are girls.

So once more…that is no reasonable opinion. It is a one who has an lively dislike for anybody trans or that helps trans rights, however she tries to color herself as a supporter of those identical individuals whereas attacking them. If trans individuals do have some form of psychological well being dysfunction as many wish to say, attacking them is much more evil.

https://www.glamour.com/story/a-complete-breakdown-of-the-jk-rowling-transgender-comments-controversy

Edited for readability.