X has added a brand new overview of what checkmarks within the app now truly symbolize, as EU investigators proceed to look at the app’s change in strategy on verification, and whether or not it violates the EU Digital Providers Act (DSA).

Final yr, then EU Commissioner Thierry Breton publicly criticized X’s change to its verification system, saying that X’s premium subscription bundle is misleading, and infringes DSA laws.

Extra particularly, the EU Fee discovered that in enabling customers to purchase blue ticks, that is doubtlessly created a brand new vector for the promotion of misinformation, as a result of the looks of a examine mark provides legitimacy to an account, as established by Twitter’s earlier verification system.

As per the EU Fee:

“Since anybody can subscribe to acquire such a ‘verified’ standing, it negatively impacts customers’ potential to make free and knowledgeable selections in regards to the authenticity of the accounts and the content material they work together with. There may be proof of motivated malicious actors abusing the ‘verified account’ to deceive customers.”

And there may be no less than some proof of precisely that, with varied manufacturers being impersonated, full with blue ticks on their accounts, on X.

In response to those preliminary findings, nevertheless, X proprietor Elon Musk was defiant, noting that X was trying “ahead to a really public battle in court docket, in order that the folks of Europe can know the reality.”

As a result of the whole lot’s, apparently, a part of a deeper conspiracy, however evidently X is now altering its tune, within the hopes of avoiding doubtlessly pricey penalties because of the EU investigation.

As reported by Bloomberg, X has now added this new explainer within the app, which gives a extra detailed overview of what checkmarks now truly symbolize:

**

As you may see, X is attempting to cut back potential confusion, in addition to accusations that it’s deceptive customers, by offering extra context on its up to date checkmark system.

It’s additionally acquired explainers inside its Assist platform that define its full verification necessities, although a few of them are additionally barely contradictory.

For instance, right here, X explains that:

“Accounts that obtain the blue checkmark as a part of a Premium subscription is not going to endure overview to substantiate that they meet the lively, notable and genuine standards that was used within the earlier course of.”

I do know what X is attempting to say right here, that the up to date system is completely different from the Twitter verification strategy of previous. However the observe that Premium subscribers is not going to endure a examine appears to run counter to this ingredient throughout the X’s listed Premium necessities:

“Your account should be lively previously 30 days to subscribe to X Premium.”

So that they do should be lively, however X received’t examine for such?

After all, miscommunication is all a part of the X expertise, with half of its Assist articles nonetheless referencing “Twitter,” “tweets,” and “retweets” in various capability. As such, contradictory messaging is just about par for the course, and X nonetheless doesn’t have an official communications division both, so there’s not lots of uniformity checking.

However that is all an apart, what X is attempting to do on this occasion is present a extra thorough rationalization of what the verification examine mark truly means in 2025, versus what it used to imply on Twitter-past.

Will that get the EU investigators off its again?

I imply, most likely not. Elon himself has been extremely crucial of the EU Fee, which doubtless hasn’t endeared him to them in any manner, whereas any evaluation can even be assessing each historic and present violations inside that overview.

And if it finds that X’s up to date examine mark strategy is in opposition to the foundations, it’ll nonetheless concern a nice, whether or not it’s modified issues now or not.

This new explainer is probably going additionally nonetheless not upfront sufficient. The Fee will little question argue that the typical person wouldn’t have been made conscious of this alteration earlier than it was enacted, which has led to confusion within the app.

During which case, X should make things better shifting ahead, however that’ll doubtless embody a notification despatched out to all customers to stipulate the total adjustments to the method.

I imply, that’s what Meta does when it falls foul of the EU guidelines, and it appears to typically be sufficient. Although Meta has additionally been fined a billion {dollars} in Europe over the previous yr, so…

(Facet observe: Meta’s additionally promoting blue ticks, so it is most likely beneath the identical scrutiny.)

Primarily, I doubt this new explainer goes to have a lot affect, however X additionally has to do one thing if it desires to appease the EU digital police.